The Geometry of Power in Central Asia

Some still chase black swans — those rare, world-shaking events that no one “saw coming” — while ignoring the grey rhinoceros that’s been quietly stomping toward them for years. It’s large, it’s loud, and it’s entirely visible. But we pretend it isn’t there.

Pakistan, long dismissed as a volatile satellite of bigger, louder powers, is no longer content to play third fiddle in someone else’s orchestra. While the old world order dines on yesterday’s talking points, Islamabad has found its own geometry — one built on tactical patience, regional convergence, and nuclear ambiguity.

💣 From the Bomb Club to a New Continental Axis

Pakistan’s nuclear arsenal — modest by Cold War standards, but regionally potent — was once treated as a dangerous indulgence. Today, it has become an asset in a new balancing act. When Pakistan signaled support for Iran in the event of a nuclear confrontation with Israel, the script flipped. The so-called “Samson Option” — Israel’s infamous doctrine of apocalyptic retaliation — suddenly looks less like a deterrent and more like a relic of theatrical diplomacy.

Enter China. Not because it seeks to “balance” the West in ideological terms — the Politburo prefers freight over flags — but because it understands architecture: ports, pipelines, corridors. Hard power, built in concrete. Gwadar, on Pakistan’s coast, is not an idea. It’s an exit strategy. And the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC) isn’t just about trade — it’s Beijing’s oxygen line in a world of maritime bottlenecks.

While the Indo-Pacific turns stormy with militarized islands and encirclements, CPEC gives China an inland path to energy markets. Pakistan is not just a partner; it’s a geopolitical ventilator.

📌 Data Points with Political Teeth

Let’s take a moment to appreciate the raw geometry behind the rhetoric:

• Pakistan: 252 million people. Crowded, fractious, and fully nuclear.
• Iran: 88 million. Surrounded by nine borders, two coasts, and a perpetual sense of siege.
• Together: Not exactly friends. Not quite allies. But increasingly aligned by necessity.

At the edge of this new triangle are two competing ports: Chabahar, developed by India as a counterweight to Chinese influence; and Gwadar, China’s foothold on the Arabian Sea. One moves with speeches; the other with shipping containers. And while India plays chess with history, China builds infrastructure on deadline.

🔥 Overstretching (Via Islamabad)

Israel’s nuclear posture has always carried a touch of drama — the unspoken arsenal, the biblical metaphors, the ever-ready doomsday switch. But something’s changed. The recent conflict with Iran, far from a quick show of force, exposed signs of fatigue.

Reports suggest Israel may have overreached — deploying more force than its logistical apparatus could handle. In geopolitical terms, it fits the pattern described by historian Paul Kennedy: a classic case of imperial overstretch. Too many fronts, too few resources, and a growing sense that military supremacy is not the same as strategic control.

In that vacuum, Pakistan has slipped in — not with declarations, but with deterrence. Quiet, calculated, and unnerving.

☢️ Atomic Double Standards

While Israel maintains one of the world’s most opaque nuclear arsenals — unsupervised, unacknowledged, and unaccountable — Iran has spent three decades under suspicion without producing a single bomb.

And yet, it is Iran that remains on the watchlist of the International Atomic Energy Agency, while Israel’s warheads are politely ignored. Dimona stays off-limits. Inspections are selective. The rules apply, but only to those who don’t already have the key to the club.

The irony is not lost on anyone in Tehran — or Islamabad. Especially as nuclear ambiguity becomes less of a deterrent and more of a performance.

🎭 The Fiction of Sectarianism

Western narratives still frame the Middle East through an old script: Sunni vs. Shia, Persian vs. Arab, chaos vs. democracy. It makes for gripping copy and linear policy briefs. But on the ground, that story is breaking down.

Pakistan, a Sunni-majority state, now collaborates openly with Shia Iran. Saudi Arabia — the Sunni hegemon — once funded Pakistan’s nuclear program. And the United States, ever the referee, sells arms to all sides while calling itself neutral.

If this is a religious conflict, it’s a very ecumenical one.

🧭 From Primakov’s Triangle to BRICS and Beyond

The old “Primakov Triangle” — Russia, China, India — is fraying. India, though still technically aligned with Moscow, grows uneasy with Beijing’s ambitions. Its presence in Chabahar was meant as a signal. But Pakistan’s growing ties with China and Iran point to a different configuration.

If Pakistan joins the BRICS+ framework, the bloc will become more than a collection of non-Western economies. It will stretch from Egypt to Bangladesh, forming a geopolitical belt of energy, logistics, and long-range strategy.

Pakistan, once the problem child of the region, now behaves like a hinge state: small in stature, oversized in consequence.

🎩 America: Between Posture and Panic

Washington continues to oscillate between diplomatic theatre and strategic confusion. While Congress debates semantics, Pakistan’s top general dines at the White House and nominates Trump — yes, that Trump — for the Nobel Peace Prize.

Call it irony. Call it tactical trolling. Either way, it’s a signal that Pakistan has learned to play by its own script.

Meanwhile, the U.S. struggles to manage its alliances. Trump speaks with Putin. Biden juggles five fronts. And beneath the surface, the Pentagon quietly prepares for a world it can no longer predict, let alone control.

🗺 Cheat Sheet for a Multipolar World

• Pakistan: Nuclear counterweight, corridor state, strategic enigma.
• Iran: Besieged yet enduring, with more borders than friends — and more resilience than expected.
• China: The new cartographer, redrawing routes without firing a shot.
• Saudi Arabia: Both client and patron, buying from Washington, hedging with the East.
• Israel: Regional titan with apocalyptic instincts and overstretched logistics.
• United States: Still a superpower, but increasingly reactive — and occasionally unsure what it’s reacting to.

🧳 Epilogue: When the Medium Powers Move the World

If history was once written by the victors, today it’s annotated by the middleweights — the so-called “secondary” powers who redraw maps not with empires, but with corridors, energy deals, and nuclear whispers.

Pakistan, once described as a geopolitical wildcard, now acts more like a pivot. It doesn’t dominate headlines. It doesn’t need to. It builds alliances, adjusts to new centers of gravity, and makes sure it’s never irrelevant.

It is not a black swan. It’s not even a grey rhinoceros anymore.

It’s just there — waiting, moving, and occasionally reminding the world that geometry always wins in the end.

---

References

Kennedy, P. (1987). The rise and fall of the great powers: Economic change and military conflict from 1500 to 2000. Random House.

SpringerLink. (n.d.). Imperial overstretch and the fall of empires. In The Geopolitics of the Global Energy Transition (pp. 39–55). https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1057/9781137023162_3

Reuters. (2024, December 19). Pakistan developing missiles that could eventually hit U.S., top official says. https://www.reuters.com/world/pakistan-developing-missiles-that-eventually-could-hit-us-top-us-official-says-2024-12-19/

Reuters. (2024, December 18). U.S. imposes more sanctions over Pakistan’s missile program. https://www.reuters.com/world/asia-pacific/us-imposes-more-sanctions-over-pakistans-missile-program-2024-12-18/

Associated Press. (2024, December 21). Pakistan dismisses U.S. missile concerns as unfounded. https://apnews.com/article/66eb36c61f3d22138972e4fd07c82a2d

Wikipedia contributors. (2024). Pakistan and weapons of mass destruction. In Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pakistan_and_weapons_of_mass_destruction

U.S. Department of State. (2024). Arms Control and Nonproliferation: Israel's Nuclear Capabilities. https://www.state.gov/reports/arms-control-and-nonproliferation

Middle East Institute. (2023, June 22). Gwadar's future: China and Pakistan's troubled strategic port on the Arabian Sea. https://mei.edu/publications/gwadar-future-china-and-pakistans-troubled-strategic-port-arabian-sea

Georgetown Journal of International Affairs. (2024, December 16). CPEC and the politics of China-Pakistan energy cooperation. https://gjia.georgetown.edu/2024/12/16/13728/

The Guardian. (2025, January 26). What went wrong with 'Pakistan's Dubai'? Inside the Chinese initiative prompting terror attacks. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2025/jan/26/what-went-wrong-with-pakistans-dubai-inside-the-chinese-initiative-that-is-prompting-terror-attacks

Wall Street Journal. (2025, July 4). White House: Pakistan developing long-range missile capable of hitting U.S. https://www.wsj.com/politics/national-security/white-house-says-pakistan-is-developing-long-range-missile-capable-of-hitting-the-u-s-0863d5eb

Economic Times India. (2025, May 2). Iran is no pushover: Israel is learning the hard way. https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/defence/iran-is-no-pushover-israel-is-learning-the-hard-way/articleshow/121886829.cms